Moving to Centralized Self-Exclusion Systems: A U.S. Gaming Trend
16 October 2026
The online gaming sector in the U.S. is increasingly embracing centralized self-exclusion systems that span multiple operators and platforms. While the shift toward these voluntary exclusion mechanisms is clear across a range of verticals, the evidence does not support claims that major poker networks have agreed to form a nationwide registry. The broader trend, however, is toward centralized self-exclusion that works across entire gaming ecosystems.
A national self-exclusion register is now a licensing requirement in nine major markets tracked by industry analysts. These registries centralize the process of banning oneself from gambling on a nationwide basis: UK (GAMSTOP), Germany (OASIS), Sweden (Spelpaus), Denmark (ROFUS), Spain (RGIAJ), New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Michigan (all three run by the Responsible Gaming Directory) and Alberta (AGLC).
Industry groups are also establishing shared self-exclusion programs. The Responsible Online Gaming Association (ROGA) launched its initial phase in 2023, with LexisNexis Risk Solutions managing a shared self-exclusion list across all member sites. When a player self-excludes on one member platform, the exclusion automatically applies across all sites in the ROGA network.
An alternative approach involves community-driven programs rather than industry-led initiatives. idPair is developing such a system for fantasy sports operators. The National Voluntary Self-Exclusion Program (NVSEP) will eventually cover all 50 U.S. states and Washington D.C., blocking excluded players from all participating fantasy sports sites regardless of location. idPair announced the plan in April 2024 with a New England launch that summer, followed by nationwide rollout by March 2026.
The NVSEP's initial supporters include fantasy sports operators PrizePicks, Underdog Fantasy, Betr and Dabble.
A unilateral change
While centralized exclusion systems expand across gaming platforms, a distinction remains between true national registries and localized shared arrangements. Some of the most centralized systems—those in New Jersey, Michigan, and Pennsylvania—are gaining attention as potential models for other states.
Important to note: these systems are not nationwide in the U.S., despite being the country's most comprehensive. Self-exclusion applies only within specific states' gambling venues, without crossing state lines. Gaming companies operating across multiple states will likely push for consolidated self-exclusion services rather than relying on separate state systems.
The newer programs from idPair and ROGA make self-exclusion easier for players seeking to restrict access across multiple sites simultaneously.
Another advantage of these shared systems is their flexibility to adapt to regulatory changes compared to static registry models.
While compliance and data protection challenges exist, this trend represents progress for player protection and regulatory oversight.